
"The Perfect Storm," Kris Tapley of InContention.com has called it. As if you weren't already convinced that this year is a close call, the academy has decided to spread the love in their nominations, which were announced yesterday morning at around 5:30am in Los Angeles.
I don't want to overstate the fact that this year is unpredictable, because I think we do have a frontrunner in each category. Some are clearer than others, but it's not as if we have no way of narrowing it down.
The Best Picture Race
In the case of Best Picture, I think we can go ahead and call it for The Hurt Locker (but only if there were a gun to my head and I just had to give you an answer). The Hurt Locker is the only nominee to carry nominations in three important areas—acting, writing, and editing, whereas Avatar only has support in the editing category. The last film to win without a writing nomination was Titanic (which Cameron directed, of course) in 1998, and the last film to win without writing OR acting was Grand Hotel in 1932. So, history advises us that The Hurt Locker is ahead of Avatar; however, as I've said before, these rules were made to be broken. Certainly, anything is possible, but the lack of support in those areas for Avatar is a notable handicap.
Up in the Air, which has taken quite a few steps back since its early lead, has been wounded further by its failure to receive an editing nomination. The last film to win without an editing nomination was Ordinary People in 1980, and it only happened a handful of times before that. Editing is often an understated category at the Oscars, but it's also a huge indicator of the winner. I think we're looking at a sole win for Up in the Air at this point, in the Adapted Screenplay category.
I still see Inglourious Basterds as the upset in the Avatar/Hurt Locker battle, but in the end, I think IB will probably only win two—Best Supporting Actor and Original Screenplay (and even that one is a bit shakey—they could easily give it to The Hurt Locker if they're feeling generous).
So, how did "the 10" pan out? Just like they wanted, I suppose. Plenty of mainstream films in the lot, and I imagine that they will get their viewership from that. However, if you want to know who the "real" Best Picture nominees are, just match them with the Best Director category.

The Snubs
Honestly, there was not a whole lot to be surprised about yesterday morning. After the Globes, the SAGs, and the BFCA, awards season often turns into a bit of an echo chamber by the time we get to the Oscar noms, and this year is no exception.
Maggie Gyllenhaal's inclusion is certainly not something we've seen yet (and it's very, very well deserved). However, if they were going to kick someone out, I'd rather it were Penelope Cruz and not Julianne Moore (a casualty I will begrudge them for until further notice).
Another long shot I was hoping might make it into the Best Supporting Actor category is Anthony Mackie of The Hurt Locker. There's been a lot of "Hey, Mackie was great, too!" talk in conjunction with Jeremy Renner's buzz, and I just thought it might have been a possible upset. Instead, they went with their usuals (but seriously, what did Matt Damon do that was so great?).
And on that note, the last snub I'll address is one that I'm elated over—Invictus. Eastwood simply did not give us the best Nelson Mandela movie he could, and I'm grateful that they did not just give him the nomination because of who he is. However, is The Blind Side really what should take its place?
If anything, The Blind Side's inclusion tells us that Sandra Bullock now has everything she needs to win Best Actress—momentum, charisma, and a Best Picture-nominated film.
God help us.
What are your thoughts on this year's nominations?






